The 5-pack gives you five full audit reports for $299. That is $60 per engagement. Scope it, run it, present findings, and sell the follow-on work that the findings create. The audit is the door opener; the remediation plan is the retainer.
Sample report
View all 11 pages
Opens in your browser · PDF
Shadow AI assessments delivered by consultancies typically run into the thousands and take weeks. Your version costs $60 in tooling, takes an afternoon, and produces the same dated evidence.
The single-report option is $99 if you want to test one engagement before buying the pack. The 3-pack at $199 ($66 each) works if five is more than your pipeline needs this quarter.
This is the consulting workflow. Each step is yours to own; the audit handles the detection mechanics so you can focus on interpretation and advice.
Ask the client which DNS filter, proxy or firewall they run. Agree on a 30-day export window. This is your intake call, and it doubles as qualification: if they have logs, you have an engagement.
Upload the client's log export to the free audit. The preview shows totals by category, risk-flag counts, and up to 10 of the AI tools found by name. Every other tool appears as a withheld row.
Quote your assessment fee. Then use one credit from your 5-pack to run the full audit. The full report handles up to 25 MB or 2,000,000 lines per export.
The report gives the data. You add the context the client cannot get from the tool alone: what to sanction, what to block, which teams need training, and where the compliance exposure sits.
Findings without a plan are a problem statement, not a deliverable. The roadmap is where your consulting value compounds: triage, sanctioning recommendations, policy drafts, vendor reviews.
One audit creates findings. Quarterly audits create a governance program. The retainer is the natural next step: each quarter, you re-run, measure the delta, and present the trend.
The report is a technical evidence document. Your job is to translate it into business decisions. Here is what each section gives you to work with.
| AI Tool | Category | Risk | Users | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | General Assistant | Medium | 87 | Opt-out available |
| Copilot | Code Generation | Medium | 34 | Enterprise tier: off |
| Grammarly | Writing | Low | 61 | Enterprise: no training |
| DeepSeek | General Assistant | High | 12 | Trains by default |
| Otter.ai | Meeting Transcription | High | 9 | Trains by default |
Every AI tool found, its functional category, and the user or device count. This is the baseline you present as "what is happening today."
Each tool carries a risk level and a training-on-data verdict with the date the vendor's terms were last checked. High-risk and trains-by-default rows are your immediate action items.
If the client has an approved-tool list, the report scores usage against it. The sanctioned share percentage is the governance metric that trends quarter over quarter.
When the log source carries user or device identifiers, the report shows which teams drive which tools. You use this to target training and sanctioning conversations.
The raw data for your own analysis. Filter, pivot, merge with the client's HR or asset data, and build the custom views your slide deck needs.
Board-ready summary, full inventory, and compliance evidence in one dated document. Hand it to the client as the deliverable alongside your interpretation deck.
The audit is the engine. Your value is the interpretation, the roadmap, and the ongoing governance. Keep the distinction clean in your proposals.
Clients buy the assessment because they lack internal bandwidth, not because they lack the tool. Your proposal prices your time and judgment, not the report. The report is the evidence that makes your recommendations defensible.
Match the engagement shape to the client's maturity and budget. Each model uses the same underlying report; the difference is how much of your time wraps around it.
| Model | Scope | Your time | Typical fee | Reports used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment only | Run the audit, present findings, hand over the PDF and CSV. | 3 to 5 hours | $1,000 to $1,500 | 1 |
| Assessment + roadmap | Findings presentation, remediation priorities, sanctioned-tool list draft, policy recommendations. | 8 to 12 hours | $2,500 to $5,000 | 1 |
| Quarterly retainer | Quarterly re-run, delta reporting, board slide, policy updates, ad hoc advisory. | 4 to 6 hours/qtr | $1,500 to $3,000/qtr | 1 per quarter |
Start with the assessment-only model to land the client. The findings almost always surface enough risk to justify the roadmap upsell. The quarterly retainer follows naturally once the first quarter's delta proves the value of monitoring.
A clean one-page proposal wins more often than a lengthy SOW. Here is the skeleton.
Data handling is usually the first question. The log is read once and deleted. No content inspection, no prompt capture, hostnames and identifiers only. Lead with this in every proposal.
The sample report uses realistic data across 37 AI tools. Ten pages: the summary your CISO client shows the board, the inventory and action plan IT acts on, the evidence compliance files away.
If the report should look like your work product rather than ours, the subscription plans put your brand on the PDF.
$249/month plus the client reports add-on at $149/month: 25 full audits a month, unused credits roll over. Your logo, brand colour, company name, contact line and website on the cover, headers and footers; your own report title, Introduction and Recommendations; no shadowaitools.com name or pricing links in the PDF.
The single report and the 3- and 5-packs keep our branding, as do free previews. Fine when you present the report as independent evidence inside your own deck.
The MSP plan also gives you private client upload links: the client uploads their log export on a page with only your logo and name, and the report arrives in your account. Details, the plan comparison and a white-label sample PDF are on the white-label Shadow AI Assessment page.
Not every prospect needs a shadow AI assessment. These signals tell you who does.
The sweet spot: organizations with 50 to 5,000 seats, a DNS filter or proxy already deployed, and a compliance or board-level motivation to quantify AI exposure. The compliance officer page carries the evidence-chain argument for that buyer.
The shadow AI assessment is a door opener. Here is the follow-on work the findings typically create, ranked by how often clients buy it.
Most clients have no written AI policy. The assessment findings give you the specifics to draft one that names real tools, not hypotheticals. Typical fee: $2,000 to $5,000 depending on organizational complexity.
The top 5 to 10 tools by usage need a vendor review: training terms, data residency, enterprise tier features. You run those reviews and deliver a sanctioning recommendation per tool. Typical fee: $500 to $1,000 per tool.
Once the sanctioned list exists, somebody has to configure the DNS filter or proxy rules. The platform guides on this site walk through each vendor's export; the blocking configuration is your billable work.
Re-run the audit every quarter, report the deltas, update policies as the landscape shifts. This is recurring revenue: one report credit and 4 to 6 hours of your time per quarter, billed at $1,500 to $3,000.
The audit report feeds DPIAs, AI Act risk registers, ISO 27001 evidence binders, and HIPAA risk assessments. If the client is under any of these frameworks, the compliance deliverable is a natural add-on. See the EU AI Act and ISO 27001 pages for the angle.
The assessment names the tools people actually use. Training built on real findings lands harder than generic AI awareness decks. One session per department, anchored in their own usage data.
This is what an actual engagement looks like, from the first call to the signed retainer. Names and specifics are fictional; the workflow is real.
The IT director exports 30 days of Umbrella DNS logs. You upload the file, run the free preview (finds 28 AI tools, 19 withheld), then burn one pack credit for the full report. 22 minutes elapsed.
The full report shows 28 AI tools across 9 categories. 4 train on customer data by default. 2 are flagged abusive-purpose. Sanctioned share: 0%, because no sanctioned list exists. You build 10 slides.
Walk the CISO and IT director through findings. The two abusive tools get blocked by end of day. You propose a remediation roadmap (sanctioned list, policy, quarterly re-run) for the follow-on SOW.
Roadmap engagement closes at $3,500. Quarterly retainer starts next quarter at $2,000/qtr. Your total year-one revenue from one $60 report: $11,500. Four remaining pack credits serve four more clients.
Five credits, multiple strategies. Choose based on your pipeline shape.
Need more than five? Buy another pack. Larger networks or custom export handling is available through the custom plan page. Credits do not expire.
Six questions you will hear in the sales conversation, with the responses that move the deal forward.
They can, for $99. What they cannot do is interpret the findings, prioritize actions, draft policies, and build the quarterly cadence. That is your value, and it is why you charge 10 to 25 times the report cost.
A CASB governs sanctioned SaaS going forward. The audit looks backward into existing logs and sweeps the long tail the CASB has not classified. They compose; the audit is faster and cheaper to start. See the detection methods comparison.
You will. Organizations with 50+ employees consistently find 15 to 40 AI tools in a 30-day window. The question is never whether AI is in use; it is how much and which tools train on the data.
The uploaded file is processed once and discarded. It is never stored, shared, or reused. Reports stay in the account for 90 days and can be deleted earlier. Hostnames and identifiers only; no prompt content is captured.
Yes, on the MSP plan ($249/month): your logo, colour and contact details, your own title, Introduction and Recommendations, and no shadowaitools.com name in the PDF. Reports bought as one-off credits keep our branding. See how white-label works.
No. The 5-pack credits stay in your account until you use them. Buy a pack at the start of the quarter and allocate credits as engagements close.
Yes. You upload the log export from your own account. The client gives you the file; you run the report and deliver the findings. One account, multiple client engagements.
Full reports handle up to 25 MB or 2,000,000 lines. For larger environments, reach out through the custom plan page for volume handling.
Not currently, and none is needed. Packs start at $60 per report; if you run assessments every month, the MSP plan works out at $24.90 per audit at full usage and adds white-label reports. No intermediary agreements either way.
Run a free preview to see the findings. If the numbers justify a full report, one 5-pack credit and three hours of your time turn those findings into a paid assessment.
Run a free audit